After reflection, EP. 15: Two factors to explain “reflection”
Maybe you heard me about this “reflective thought”. We are concerned about philosophers and cognitive scientists. However, we lack the definition of ‘reflective thinking’ that philosophers and scientists can serve.
Because I do philosophy and cognitive science, I had to synthesize measurable construction from areas like psychology and philosophy.
In this passage, I will read my last role, which explains the two main features of “reflection” and how we measure. This account of the two factor of thought reflection may contain centuries of English scholarships. And the double system has the effects of rationality, personal knowledge and the theories called.
As always, my Paper’s free asprints are available in my CVAN Byrdnick.com/CV “Publications” section.
The episode member is a pair of Course. Course is something for everyone: students, teachers, schools, companies as well as the government. Find out how they can serve your educational needs in Coursera.com/Byrd.
You can find here or in your podcast application on the podcast of reflection. If you like what you hear, you can subscribe to the place where you find podcasts, follow Bluesky at @ byrdnick.com, Mastadon (@Byrdnick) and all the rest of the platforms. If you end up enjoying the podcast for reflection, it feels free to tell people, online, personally or in your review.
Related messages
Podcast: Play in the new window Download (Duration: 43:28 – 59MB)
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Tunein | | | | |) More
