Am I envious Marxist? II: envy
Envy enviary, a person who envy could be naughty and envious who envy them in a negative way they didn’t see. It could happen for a variety of reasons, such as desire to explain their failures or feel better, that negative qualities envy. For example, a person who envited the rich can explain his lack of wealth in terms of rich and “system” machining, while the rich is suffering from greed, dishonority and corruption. Thus, people against those who envy could be envious. There is a bias like this, then the person who envy would reduce the credibility of their bias. This is to accept negative claims about those who envy. So it would be rational to consider the impact of the bias when evaluating claims.
But bias is no pure choice Bias proof, 1 person is envious and 2) should be evidence. If this test is, then we should consider the effect of the bias in the person’s claims. This approach may merit in the context of the authority’s argument.
The argument of the authority occurs that the claim must be accepted to be argued that the subject is authority (expert). The form has:
1. Premise: A person A command is (expert) s in the subject.
2. Premise: A says S above S.
Conclusion: P is true.
This inductive argument is evaluated in terms of the quality of the expert and, whether the expert is remarkably naughty. If an expert is not considered a reliable title, then accepting the naughty claim would be the mistake of logic. If I were so envious to the rich, I was significantly twisted against them, and then the claims I do around me are not based on my (supposed) specialization.
But even if someone is envious and very naughty, this did not claim claims when claims standing or falling on their own. Otherwise think that the foul envy discussed in the previous attempt would be to report allegation. The logical response of Biani is not reject Claims, but are able to perform exams. Even if I had an incredibly envious of the rich, it should not follow my claims about capitalism should be evaluated in his merit. But I envy the rich? To answer this, I need to consider the nature of envy.
At his core, envy wants someone else. This can be (for example) to quality (eg, such as a fast runner). But not wanting to define the characteristic of envy of someone else. You may be artistic skills to match Rembrandt, but that doesn’t have to envy you. Envy has resentment with the owner of the desired person and often involves a desire to take it. But that doesn’t catch the envy properly. Suppose you start a business with a reliable business, but they betray and escape your country with your money. You want money, that’s it, and you want to get rid of them. But it would be wrong to say that you are envy. More added to complement the envy recipe.
A plausible add-on is that resentment should be unwanted, and the desire is wrong in an important way. In the case of hypothetical traitor, your resentment is guaranteed and the desire for your money is appropriate. The implementation of an envious claim, therefore, shows what a person is unjustly put, and their desire is wrong. Envy also involves the disability to get what they want to envy. If possible, they would not be envious. The person envy, therefore, suffers some moral failures of their desire. This is almost no need for “envy” definition necessary and sufficient to classify whether I envy the rich.
To be the envy of the rich, I would like to be rich. I would also need the unfair resentment of the rich, the wrong desire to be rich, and maybe the rich will not be rich and the ability to be rich. Let’s take turns in each of these. As long as I want to have some money (food and shoes are not free), I don’t want to be rich. As evidence, the possibilities of my life are not becoming rich. For example, I made my doctorate in philosophy and then became a teacher. I had a lot more profit and professional. While I write books, they are philosophy and in the game, rather than more profitable areas. If I wanted to be a rich, I would have effectively. But as long as I want to be rich, I lack the ability and constantly stuck in a “lower” life.
I also had an easy and obvious response since I had the ability to complete the doctorate, I also had the ability to complete the advanced level. I was a university athlete and even though I was still trained regularly, I stick to the challenges of the task and stick through difficulties. The passage of my strengths and achievements, preferable, I had enough to mean I was a much profitable career if I wanted to be a rich teacher. I don’t say I would be rich; If I just wanted to be rich, much more likely than a path is likely to achieve this result in a career. If it were rich my goal, I would try. If I had a bitter failure, an envy load may contain some merits. But it is a strange claim that I envy that I never wanted. Some secrets of knowledge of my motives could be claimed, but that will not be accepted speculation.
I don’t have unfair winning wealth, such as working in a sharp job. I have a negative approach for those who have unfairly acquired richness, who used their wealth to the detriment of others or dissipate opportunities that gave their riches. I think the current system is unfair, but I don’t feel angry that I’m treated unfairly. Rather, I feel angry in the harmful aspects of the economic system we created and perpetuated.
I think the rich must have less wealth, they had to help them more and do better with their wealth. But I also think everyone should use their more resources to do good, including me. Like most people, I don’t always live in my moral ideals. But I don’t want to remove rich wealth and leave the poor. Being poor in America is a terrible thing, so I don’t want to be poor.
That being the case, I have a negative view of some rich people and I have serious criticism of the current economic system, I don’t envy the rich. However, this is not important for critics I do.
