Covid-19 IV Lessons: (MIS) Information
The lesson that had to be learned from the 1918 flu pandemic is that honesty and detailed information is critical to address the pandemic. The threat of the flu was initially declining, allowing you to spread. Officials have also failed to report the risk of public. An example is Philadelphia’s infamous parade and allowed the flu to expand like a wild beast. This was infected with more than 1,000 people and more than 200,000. While this disaster had to give the lesson, he continued the denial, decline and fraud. Thinking spread to the top, Woodrow Wilson (a Democrat) remained silent around the flu. Although there is no way to calculate how many people who did not kill detailed information, it makes sense to infer that life could be saved. Given this historical lesson, we should be ready to face Covid-19 with honest and accurate information. But it wasn’t like that. As an American, I will be based on my government, even though other nations would also be useful.
Covid-19 was first identified in January, the former Trump officials (Bossont and Gottlieb) began to warn the virus, drawing new 1918 pandemic lessons and tragic lessons. The initial response to Fox News was to throw the virus as he intended to harm Trump. According to Snopes, Trump has not claimed the virus, but rather accused of creating a new democratic hoax, the alleged hoax goal is to be inept and dangerous manipulation of the virus. The severity of the threat was evolved in reducing, making false claims about the expansion of the virus and other critical issues. Although the White Houses and Fox News seemed to take the threat seriously, it was expanding dangerous misinformation. An example of moral carelessness was that the test kits were easily available so that the federal government can be given to states. That was not true and liar costs the time they have used to create and distribute his test kits. It was as if your house was on fire and the fire firefighters said they were alone with great new firefighters. But they were lying down, they weren’t on the way and had only a few garden sleeves.
Due to downplaying and deception, the truths could be prevented from deaths. If Trump and Fox News had told the truth, people would still get sick, but we would better prepare and can alleviate the damage. Instead, Trump and Fox News (and others) launched the viral enemy with a friend and misinformation and some deaths are partially.
Covid-19’s lessons are repetitions from Pandemic 1918: An honest and accurate information must be given to public health to respond to public health threats. Such honesty can cost a politician, especially if they are able to manage the crisis. But the cost of silence and misinformation is always greater when the public pays. The concern of the leader, however, must be good for people, not his private benefit.
Silence and misinformation could be made against cases that may be benefited. That is, hiding or lies caused a better result than true. Although it may contain some merits in some cases, the 1918 and 2019 Pandemics shows that the response of pandemic. To claim that silence or fraud may be unknown cases of unknown, it would be to use the fallacy of ignorance. Silence or fraud claim is good there potential It is awesome logic cases that work at work. Although the previous politicians and leaders are focused, it is worth considering the threat of disinformation from the public members.
As expected, citizens also expanded the disinformation. In some cases, it is the result of ignorance. People can play from beneficial reasons, but they are doing damage, expanding false claims. For example, a person can believe that drinking bleach can cavid-19 heals and care. Although good reasons cannot be critically evaluated by people claiming the claims is to verify against one’s observation against one’s quick test, against one’s background and compelling claims. Using the example of bleach, bleach bottles have significant remarks about bleach (observation) and most people are bleach poison. If the claim matches all three, it makes sense to verify that. If he does not, it makes sense to question the claim or at least suspend the judgment. People should also critically evaluate claims of claims. If no source is provided, the claim must go with the previous methods. If a source is provided, the source must be confirmed and evaluated. The credibility of the fountain depends mainly on the source knowledge (which is likely to be correct) and their lack of bias (twisted source is more compelling, as a reason for liars). In general, the wise and partial sources are good sources; Naughty or ignorant sources are not. It is certainly cautious to suspend the verdict.
There are also those who expand the misinformation. It can be money, such as Jim Bakker Televisian Televise for fake healing or efforts for sale for political advantages, such as expanding Russian pandemia efforts, disinformation in the west. There are also trolls that expanded the misinformation because they want to be fun or hurt people. There is no reasonable way to argue that humans can make money morally acceptable or do harmful trolls. But perhaps a case is impossible to justify nations. After all, if you use the war or otherwise hurt and kill people is morally acceptable, and then people seem to hurt through disinformation. That is, if we allow people to kill people with bullets and bombs, it is difficult to lose lies.
A possible answer is arguing that the pandemic is a war on both sides: humans and pathogen. Therefore, when a country uses the disinformation in a pandemic, they help the enemy of all humanity and betraying the war. The more dramatic and pragmatic response is that this misinformation, as a virus, tends to expand like a virus, so that a country that arms is the risk of contaminating its population. Social media is, of course, the possibility of distributing the most disinformation and disinformation.
Although the media of political languages may be a sensable discussion, it seems that good arguments allow social media companies to eninformation and disinformation of the pandemic. Returning to the virus analogy, it would be like Uber to have a policy that allows people to get to know people infected with dangerous diseases to have relationships with healthy people. There is also war analogy. If social media do not misinformation and misinformation disinformation in Pandemia, they are helping the enemy during the war.
Closing here, lessons are clear: leaders must immediately provide detailed information about pandemics, criticism to citizens to accept information, and the disinformation must be intentionally extended moral Crime against humanity during the war.
