Covid-19 VII: Critical Union
As we should be in the same group in a pandemic, we should ignore our differences and work for victory. If we fight, if we compete against bicker and each other, we are hurting. If we are cooperating, we will help man in groups. As with the sport, the greater the strength, the more important it is to work with the team and leave less important concerns for at least the duration of the game. It would be reasonable to think that everyone will be a good player in the team, still hopefully that team members do not try to hinder the necessary conflict or effort to gain. Unfortunately, for the world, there will be people who are bad for group players and some people will actively damage the next pandemic.
While examples outside the United States are Americans, I am American and have the responsibility of my people and the citizens. In the last pandemic, Trump has been president and can be seen as a senior American trainer in the group. The group should be addressed to victory, inspired by players and do his work properly.
As mentioned in other attempts, pandemic, Trump and his allies were honest, were floated stories about hoaxis. Before listening to medical experts, Trump and his fellow disinformation and disinformation spread. Trump and his fellows also begin our response to virus, something that loves us. What Trump and his fellows should do for human beings. To use an analogy, Trump was a coach who admitted that he was not in a team against. Like a bad trainer, Trump had to practice and prepared that his team would not be easy to win. And he lied to the team.
During the pandemia, Trump trumped constantly. First, he made conflicts with governors. Part of the problem Trump saw himself that they had business offers, rather than being a leader in a country in crisis. Another part of the problem Trump apparently cannot avoid small fights. It takes things very personal, in general, it is not true about other actual presidents. For example, while Bush criticized the handling of Katrina, Bush did not support the support because governments did not overwhelm his condition. To continue the analogy of the group, Trump was a coach who revenge against assistant coaches, if they do not attract his situation. Criticism, yet legitimate, hostility and punished. This actively harmed the group.
The governor could also be against the fault. They were responsible for working with his mistakes to achieve their situation. So if the governor Ny must praise Trump, when he does not deny the full support of the state, then he must praise Trump. While this makes a pragmatic sense, it is morally horrible. In a democratic country it is not a duty of governors or citizens to carry their work to the President’s situation. It is the duty of the President to do the job, but also in the face of criticism. This is how he works diligently. If a leader can’t step and do the job, they should ignore it. Returning to the group analogy, if the narcisistic trainer harms the group, the solution is not making helpers harder to calm his ego. The solution is getting a new coach.
Second, Trump advanced the theory of conspiracies that are stealing the equipment protection by medical professionals. Encourage this conspiracy theory was damaged. Trump likes the theories of conspiracies and often used to change the blame for themselves. But that doesn’t have a good team. If you return to analogue, this is accused of accusing them of accusing the coaches to steal and accuse them. Supplies would be available for a big game.
Trump supporters, at this time, accuse me of hypocrisy: “How can you speak unity while you criticize Trump?” The first answer is the basic logic: I was also hypocritical, which would not give up my claim. Otherwise it would be the victim to be the victim to Ad Hominem Tu Quoque. A version of this fallacy concludes that the action of a person is incompatible with the claim, their claim must be incorrect. But logic is bad. For example, suppose that the bill has claimed that adultery is wrong and then adultery. This would show that it was a hypocrit, but would not be discarded by his claim.
The second answer is that we need to be my vision critical Union. This is not critical People mean to go with what people say and do with what does. Critical unity can be worse than lack of union. For example, imagine everyone with the initial claims about the virus and no one has ever returned against his misinformation and misinformation. Things would be much worse. As another example, imagine the next pandemic “left” state government ” legally He assumed the property of the wealthy to distribute the resources to survive. Trump helpers would not answer “Well, we need to join behind our leaders,” and we would go along with this.
Critical part of crisis in a crisis must have limits. Criticism should be based on the truth, based on principles and aimed at real problems. Criticizing Trump’s misinformation, misinformation, conspiracy theories, etc., is a critical union unity. I apply the same rules during the political spectrum. So, for example, if a democratic leader expands pandemic misinformation or refusing to do their job, because they are turning on with a Republican, and would be critic. During the spectrum I will also help to step on leaders and when they do the best they can. For example, I don’t agree with Ohio Governor Mike Dewine (even though we both went to Ohio University), but I credited him for a serious response to Covid-19.
Here is the lesson that we need to be unity in times of crisis (it is obvious), but it would be sensible to think and impatience (it is equally obvious). While we need to work with our leaders, they need to be worth our merging under our leadership. Trump worked as a paradigm instead of joining the crisis that can actively distribute the leader. He or similar person (Democrat or Republican) is the president in the next pandemic, we can expect things to go wrong.
