Critical thinking and pandemic: authoritative argument

While rejecting the medical claims of health experts who are experts in the favor of a ruler, this happened in the last pandemic and will happen again. Why people do this especially for psychology account, but in reasoning errors are philosophy.

Those who accept as a medical authority as authority are being victimed to a falling attractive attractiveness, it is worth the exact version of falling. I am calling this fallacy authoritative argument. Error occurs when a person believes in the claim because it makes authoritarian leaders that support them. The form has:

1. Premise: Authoritarian leader makes LK claim c.

Conclusion: C claim is true.

The authoritarian leader does not provide any evidence that the claim is supported. It also does not condemn the claim. Accepting or rejecting the claim would be errors that matched from an authoritarian. Authoritarian could be correct, but, as with any logical contribution, the error consists in reasoning.

The use of my usual mathematics illustrates why it is bad logic:

1. Premise: Leader claims to be 2 + 2 = 7.

Conclusion: Dear leader is fine.

At this point, someone may say that someone who can tell you what the authoritarian authority claims. They could be unfeasured, exile, tortured or killed. It is true that there is a rational reason for believing that a claim is true and is a pragmatic reason to accept the claim or at least because of this, therefore, therefore, this is why, if desired, if desired, the pragmatic reason. The fear of revenge by an authoritarian can give practical reasons to go with them, but that does not provide evidence. No matter how violically scenarios 2 + 2 = many people, 2 + 2 = 4. Despite the motivation to accept authoritative argument, there are other psychological reasons for driving bad logic. This leads us to an authoritative type of Leader and a simplified look at the type of authoritarian followers. The same person may have qualities between the two, and everyone has at least some of these features. The title of a person is most important.

Leader is considered a special type of leader as a leader. At the ends, authoritarian leaders believe that they are the voice of followers, and they can only carry it. Or, like Trump, “I can only fix it.” Under which, they are extraordinary skills, knowledge and skills. Socrates knew that people know so much more than you think, but authoritarian leaders lead to ends and exceeds the skills. This, as expected, leads false claims and mistakes.

The authoritarian leader is very reluctant to accept his mistakes and boundaries, they must be dishonest for the degree, not delusional and misleading are not dishonest. Because lies and illusions need to be maintained about their greatness and success, the authoritarian leader is criticism, disagreement and competition intolerance. As far as I can do, they use coercion against those who are not insulted and insulted when they cannot be intimidated. Because the facts, logic and science would say against them, they tend to oppose all of them and form many beliefs that have feelings, biases and bad logic. They encourage the following to do the same thing, they would not be true followers, because no one continued after them.

While an authoritarian leader may have an excessive excessive competition and the fear of the competent, it is to denying their insults. It is a second approach to accuse others, because the leader is in charge of someone else. A method of doing this It is, which someone else finds that the failure of leadership is not worth blaming.

For the authoritarian, there is a paradox here. They must confirm their greatness and, at the same time, they do not blame their enemies. These opponents should be pathetic and extraordinary dangerous, stupid and excellent, incomprehensible and efficient and efficient and so on.

A authoritarian leader followers and fortunately, for them, there are people from the follower of the authority. Oportunists often use authoritarian leaders and to help, they are not believers. The authoritarian follower believes that they are unique, that only leaders can solve things. Thus, followers must buy leaders in the excitement and lying, despite the opposite evidence. And that’s very dangerous.

As the leader will often fail to fail, followers must accept the explanations given to them. This requires rejecting incidents and logic. Followers embrace lies and conspiracy theories, whatever the narrative of their leader is accepted. Those who disagree with the leader are not wrong, they are the enemies of the boss and therefore the enemies of the followers. The claims that do not agree are excluded by hand, often hostility and insults. Thus, followers tend to be epistemically isolate, that is, an elegant way to say anything that is never achieved before the eyes. This includes what I call the accusation of hatred.

As I tried to discuss with the last pandpon, Covid-19 Trump, it almost always ended with them that I hated me with Trump and I said nothing when I rejected Trump’s claims. I think they were honest. Like everyone, they believe and exclude based on how sources feel. Trump likes that they believed even when he claimed evidence. When I didn’t agree with false trump claims, they concluded that I had to hate Trump. Otherwise I would believe his claims. As I looked, he also meant that I was wrong. While this makes a psychological sense, it is a bad logic and can be submitted as a fallastic: the accusation of hate. The form has:

1. Premise: A person rejects Bor’s claim C.

2. Premise: A person is accused of hating.

Conclusion: C claim is true.

As shown by silly examples of my usual mathematics, it’s a bad logic:

1. Premise: Dave rejected Adolph’s claim 2 + 2 = 7.

2. Premise: Dave hates Adolph.

Conclusion: So 2 + 2 = 7.

While someone hates it would be a naughty factor, which does not condemn the alleged hater proclamation. It can have psychological strength as people ignore the claims made by someone made by someone. This is especially true for the authoritarian followers who defend their leader.

Authoritarian leaders often have liars that often fail and others deny a hat, they are very dangerous. The greater the strength, the more damage they can do. Followers are enabled, which also makes dangerous. The authoritarian solution in democracy is to vote and will be achieved in the lifelong swamp and illusion leader. Until then, the leaders of the authority must violate truth and good science to take rational decisions; Otherwise, the next pandemic will lead America to disaster while lies and excitences are blown.