Blog philosophy Ethics of post-death sperm
philosophy

Ethics of post-death sperm

Ethics of post-death sperm

Because the UK had a lack of sperm donors, men proposed after their sperm is dead. As with other post-death donations, the material provided would be taken and used. This includes some ethical problems.

It should be noted that the donation process is voluntary, and the sperm does not collect without permission. That being the case, the main moral problem is whether such a donation is morally acceptable. The specific action of giving the death of sperm death falls into two wider moral areas. The first is the ethics of giving nothing after death. If these donations were morally unacceptable, then the donation of sperm after death would be unacceptable. While the general ethics of post-death donations is better than the scope of this work, the ethics of the organs after death is well established: it is not acceptable, but rather praised. But that does not establish that after the post-death sperm donation is acceptable.

The second is generally the ethic donation of sperm. If this is morally wrong, the donation of post-death sperm would also be morally wrong. Although some emit mainly with the donation of sperm, it does not seem to be a morally problem, but that is also important that it is outside the scope of this work

The donation of post-death sperms and a general death donation is that it is a sperm. Thus, post-death sperm donation is a specific moral concern for death after death. Therefore, this is the only factor that separates the donation of post-death sperm. So the question is what happens when the lender is dead in front of donors.

There may be a bit of the post-death party’s “ی” factor, “Ikly arguments” does not write much moral weight in terms of the moral state of “ick” action. There are certainly many other morally important reflections, and I will focus on them.

Moral concern is the treatment of the dead. If you take care of the deceased, when the procedure learning is the influence of family and friends. There is also concern about treating the dead and argues that sperm would be contemptible. It could be argued that the procedure is no longer than those who are not used to combine the organs of gifted organ. People have authorized the procedure; If they did not deceive or deceive about the procedure, the adult consent cancel his family’s concerns and deals with the subject of respect. If those who make extracts join the donor’s permission and do not do it beyond that permit, they would act respectfully.

There is also a pragmatic concern: a donor may die from a genetic state. This information can be corrected by providing potential recipients so that they have an informed choice. And any given sperm would be the risk of possible genetic problems.

It is an object before sperm given the parents to think that parents will be lost. They will never be able to discover the biological father. As long as you think the situation is strange, the father is like the cases that die before the baby is born. Although it is unusual, it happens. The war, for example, claimed his father before birth. In the case of typical donor, it is likely to have fewer emotional effects, as the lender had no connection to his mother. There is also a living sperm donor that could be killed before his children decide to seek him and there is no kids who want to know the lender. Therefore, it seems that there is no special moral problem with death without death, which makes it different from other cases that separates the sperm created by a child.

Another concern is that while a given organ can give life, the sperm given creates a new person. A worry is that the spouse or partner of the deceased can harm. While a matter of concern, the same problem is created with living sperm. Also, if the spouse or partner is worried about it, they need to direct this with the man while this is alive. But that is, of course, the donation of post-death sperm; The man chooses to give his sperm to give two types of donations. So the sperm decided to give away the ethics of a married man remains the same when donation is alive or when it is dead.

Based on the previous one, if the man has permission, it is not a specific moral problem with the donation of post-death sperm. Therefore, if the donation of sperm donation and death is acceptable the components of the post-death, there is also a donation of post-death sperm.

Exit mobile version