June 8, 2025
history

BackStory with the American Historical past Guys

BackStory with the American Historical past Guys


City renewal has obtained a nasty rap over the previous few a long time. The phrase typically brings to thoughts inhabitants displacement, the destruction of historic neighborhoods, and a common failure of the general public sphere. However that is removed from the entire story.

Lizabeth Cohen’s e book “Saving America’s Cities: Ed Logue and the Wrestle to Renew City America within the Suburban Age” examines the historical past of city renewal within the a long time following World Battle II by the profession of influential city planner Ed Logue. The evolution of Logue’s work neatly follows the trajectory of city coverage over this time, tracing the altering steadiness between public authorities applications and personal pursuits. What emerges is a narrative concerning the nature of American democracy, and the connection of various ranges of presidency to one another and to their communities. Finally, Cohen illuminates not solely how America’s cities turned what they’re as we speak, but additionally what they may turn out to be sooner or later.

BackStory not too long ago spoke with Lizabeth Cohen about “Saving America’s Cities,” which was simply introduced as a winner of the 2020 Bancroft Prize in American Historical past and Diplomacy.

 

BackStory: How did you determine on Ed Logue as the topic for this e book? What have been some benefits of telling this historical past by a person, and did you face any main limitations from this method?

Cohen: I knew that I needed to analyze the destiny of post-World Battle II American cities as they confronted the explosion of suburbanization. My earlier books (Making a New Deal and A Customers’ Republic) had each been set in cities, the previous targeted on Chicago, the latter within the metropolitan New York space, notably Northern New Jersey. However the metropolis itself was not the problematic, the true topic of inquiry, in these books. Furthermore, different historians, together with me in A Customers’ Republic, had written extensively on how the federal authorities incentivized the growth in postwar suburbia by mortgage lending and freeway constructing. However little consideration had been paid to how cities coped with the massive exit of residents, employers, and capital extra broadly from the Nineteen Forties onward. Most American cities have been actually in hassle after a decade of despair adopted by the deprivations of wartime. I additionally needed to make it possible for I used to be attentive to the altering bodily constructed setting as postwar cities met these challenges.

My subsequent query was how one can go about framing this e book. My earlier work had been social historical past, the place I investigated the life experiences of varied teams of bizarre People—first- and second-generation immigrants, employees, middle-class owners and shoppers, African People who had had not too long ago moved from the South to the North, and so forth. For this new e book, I felt it was extra applicable to place a person with nice affect on the heart of my story, whereas nonetheless taking note of the social identities that matter a lot to social historians, reminiscent of class, gender, race, ethnicity, career and the like. A biographical focus, I hoped, may also attraction to common readers, making my e book extra accessible. So I looked for a protagonist whose life and work would enable me to inform two intertwined tales: how each an individual and a nation went about attempting to revitalize American cities over a considerable time period.

I knew about Ed Logue from a course I had taught at Harvard on Boston’s historical past, as he was typically credited with turning round a deteriorating metropolis and transferring it in direction of a “New Boston.” What I realized over time satisfied me that Logue was a great car for my e book. Logue had a protracted, influential profession working in lots of cities–New Haven within the Fifties, Boston within the Nineteen Sixties, New York State within the Nineteen Seventies, and the South Bronx within the Nineteen Eighties. (He died in 2000.) Over that half-century, Logue responded to shifts in authorities insurance policies in direction of cities in addition to classes he realized on the job. It helped me as effectively that he had left an enormous cache of papers at his alma mater of Yale. Over his lifetime, Logue had given many interviews, so though he was not dwelling, I’d nonetheless “hear his voice.” Additionally, lots of his colleagues and members of the family have been nonetheless alive, and have been very keen and keen to speak to me. There was even an internet site, “The Buddies of Edward J. Logue.” So I started my analysis in voluminous archives and printed sources and undertook virtually 100 interviews with individuals who had recognized and labored with Ed Logue.

Ed Logue seated at a table in front of maps.

Picture: Bolivar Arellano

The largest problem I confronted in placing Logue on the heart of my e book was determining what features of his life and profession have been related to my historic venture to know the evolution of postwar cities and what weren’t. I made a decision that I’d solely talk about features of his life that had a bearing on his public work. I made occasional exceptions to maintain the reader and knowledgeable, however typically this was a e book a few highly effective particular person’s public profession, not his personal life. One other problem was calibrating my very own relationship to my topic. I attempted very onerous to deal with Logue and his work with even handedness, to acknowledge the prices and achievements of city renewal, because it was typically referred to as. And I needed to convey that Logue was an advanced determine who was cherished and admired by some and significantly resented and feared by others. Typically I’d catch myself turning into too empathetic and wish to drag again. Different occasions I felt I used to be being too powerful on Logue, making use of as we speak’s information and expectations ahistorically to him at an earlier second in time. Lastly, I apprehensive that the many individuals nonetheless round who knew Logue or labored in associated fields may contradict my interpretation. That’s much less of an issue if you write about an ancient times of historical past, or when your topic is a broad social group. Ultimately, nevertheless, I’ve been challenged little or no by Logue’s colleagues. Most of them, actually, are joyful to see the work that he and so they did be handled significantly as historical past.

BackStory: Ed Logue’s profession noticed a shift within the steadiness of the roles of the professional and the group in city renewal initiatives. What does this trajectory inform us concerning the nature of democracy and function of presidency within the twentieth century?

Cohen: This query identifies an necessary theme of Saving America’s Cities, a shift in how communities responded to city renewal and what city redevelopers like Ed Logue needed to alter to in finishing up their initiatives. I argue that within the first section of city renewal in the course of the Fifties—in New Haven for Logue however in lots of cities all around the nation—group session operated as what I name “pluralist democracy,” a time period I borrowed from a basic research of New Haven’s city renewal by Yale political scientist Robert Dahl entitled Who Governs? Leaders of established organizations and curiosity teams have been tapped to advise city renewers however there was little or no broad, grassroots participation. Reasonably, Logue thought-about himself and his workers to be consultants who would keep on within the custom of FDR’s New Deal and convey the sources and expertise of the federal authorities to bear on the following drawback to unravel—failing cities.

By the mid-Nineteen Sixties, in New Haven, Boston, and elsewhere, neighborhoods had realized to be a lot much less accepting and most significantly, how one can negotiate with metropolis redevelopment companies and planners to get extra of what they needed, reminiscent of extra backed housing. I label that new period one in all “participatory democracy.” In Boston, these abilities would assist residents defeat two main freeway initiatives within the Nineteen Seventies, the Southwest Expressway and the Internal Belt.

A sign in a shop window reads "How About it Mr. Logue? Do we Go or Do We Stay?"

Courtesy of Boston Metropolis Archives

I watch how over the course of his profession Logue realized to work inside an city redevelopment regime the place he should interact an increasing number of with communities. That partnering didn’t come simply to Logue, however by his work within the South Bronx within the Nineteen Eighties he had come to acknowledge how essential it was to any success. There he collaborated intently with group planning boards and native CDCs on initiatives to construct a lot wanted inexpensive housing.

On the finish of the e book I acknowledge the need of participating communities within the necessary selections that can have an effect on them. However I additionally increase some issues about how we are able to try this whereas additionally avoiding extreme NIMBYism or planning that’s so narrowly outlined by neighborhood that the way forward for town as an entire shouldn’t be adequately thought-about.

BackStory: One factor that I discovered fascinating concerning the e book is the way it illustrated a cross-section of various ranges of presidency, and the way these ranges interacted in advanced methods over the second half of the twentieth century. Was the method of city renewal a driving issue within the reshaping of those relationships, or merely a mirrored image of those modifications?

Cohen: That’s a really attention-grabbing query. Logue had many alternatives over his profession to work on the federal degree—for Senator Hubert Humphrey, for what turned the Division of Housing and City Improvement, and extra—however he all the time selected different alternatives on the municipal and state ranges the place he felt he might have extra direct impression. On the identical time, he felt the federal authorities’s sources have been completely essential to revitalize struggling cities and construct backed housing. In reality, he watched in dismay as these federal {dollars} declined, first with the prices of the Vietnam Battle underneath President Lyndon Johnson after which with an ideological shift, initiated by President Richard Nixon, away from federal applications in direction of his “New Federalism.” Ronald Reagan would take all of it an enormous step additional and argue that the personal sector, not the general public realm, must be fixing these city issues.

Logue and others seated around a table holding miniature models of buildings.

Marcus Garvey Planning Assembly. Courtesy of Robert Perron Pictures

Logue’s main engagement with state authorities was his seven-year stint as President of the highly effective New York State City Improvement Company (UDC). Readers of the e book watch as this idealistic group falls aside for a lot of causes. However whereas it lasted, the UDC marked a major effort on Logue’s half to seek for options to fading federal financing of what he felt have been significantly wanted interventions to supply housing and help cities extra typically.

By way of whether or not city renewal led or was swept up in these shifts from federal to decrease ranges of presidency and from the general public to non-public sector, I’d say that transformation came about in lots of coverage areas however that housing and concrete initiatives have been notably affected as a result of there have been options conceivable on this realm, the place there weren’t all the time in others.

BackStory: Your e book wrestles with many forces which have formed the function and energy of the federal authorities, and the constraints of personal pursuits in shaping the general public sphere. What provoked your exploration of those questions?

Cohen: One other of my motives for penning this e book that I ought to point out right here was my alarm on the present nationwide disaster in inexpensive housing and the deterioration of a lot city infrastructure all through the nation. I felt that the failure over many a long time to take a position public sources in these primary social wants required additional investigation. I used to be additionally affected by watching how the nation rebuilt after the disaster of Katrina and the foreclosures disaster of the Nice Recession. Non-public sector pursuits seized alternatives and additional undermined how individuals perceived the effectiveness and significance of presidency. I’m watching intently how the nation offers with the COVID-19 pandemic and fear significantly that we’ll see additional eroding of the general public sector’s capability and authority. And we must always keep alert to doable corruption that may accompany the better empowerment of the personal sector to take care of the disaster.

BackStory: You describe how each American conservatives and progressives forged the historical past of federal city improvement as an “abject failure.” What has motivated this characterization? Does it inform us something about how historical past is definitely created and interpreted?

Cohen: It had turn out to be accepted knowledge on all political fronts that all the pieces concerning the city renewal period was dangerous. I don’t dispute that there’s a lot reality in that assertion. I present very clearly that the majority efforts undertaken within the Fifties have been deeply flawed. However I attempt to make the case that city renewal was not one unshifting catastrophe over many a long time that must be totally written off. Reasonably, I present that city redevelopers like Logue developed over time, realized from their errors, and in some circumstances even promoted some progressive objectives. Logue, for instance, was deeply dedicated to creating mixed-income, mixed-race, and blended age communities, aspirations we nonetheless maintain as we speak. And he labored onerous to make the case that entire metropolitan areas have to be concerned in fixing the housing and different issues dealing with low-income residents of cities. For instance, readers observe Logue’s in the end failed effort on the UDC to construct modest quantities of what he referred to as “Honest Share Housing” in 9 well-off Westchester County cities.

Group of protestors, many holding signs that read "UDC Lie"

Bedford Protest Assembly UDC Annual Report. From Annual Report of the New York State City Improvement Company, 1972.

When ideologically-based assumptions which might be under-investigated prevail, necessary objectives and even successes can simply get forgotten. We “throw the child out with the bathwater,” so to talk. By assuming that there was nothing redeemable concerning the federal authorities taking part in a major function in revitalizing cities, notably financially, we abandon the chance to struggle for that risk as soon as once more. I despair on the present second the place cities discover themselves virtually completely depending on squeezing sources out of personal builders to unravel the disaster of inexpensive housing and rather more. And cities compete with one another to win an Amazon or GE headquarters and funding {dollars}, at the price of sacrificing future tax revenues and placing extra uncompensated burdens on already shaky companies. Making a extra nuanced historical past of a controversial topic like city renewal not solely makes for a extra correct historic file, however it may well present a extra useable previous and counsel options for the longer term that we’d not in any other case have thought-about. In a capitalist society like ours, the personal sector will all the time play a major function. It did within the heyday of federal city renewal and it actually does as we speak. However it issues significantly which sector—public or personal—is within the driver’s seat. Logue believed deeply that it was the duty of presidency to signify the general public curiosity and, flaws and all, he fought to make it so for over half a century.

 

Lizabeth Cohen is the Howard Mumford Jones Professor of American Research at Harvard College and the previous dean of the Radcliffe Institute for Superior Examine. She is the creator of Making a New Deal: Industrial Staff in Chicago, 1919-1939, a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize and winner of the Bancroft Prize, and of A Customers’ Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America.

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service

PROS

+
Add Field

CONS

+
Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video