How Labor and the Liberals are speaking

object(WP_Post)#8511 (24) {
(“ID”)=>
int(39594)
(“post_author”)=>
string(2) “36”
(“post_date”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-30 23:54:10”
(“post_date_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-30 23:54:10”
(“post_content”)=>
string(9120) “

The largest affect on public notion of the 2025 election marketing campaign was not coverage. It was id, tradition wars, and a rising concern of Australia ‘changing into America’. What started as a concentrate on easing the price of residing rapidly widened right into a broader debate about nationwide id. Media protection and social media feeds revealed a tug of conflict. On one facet was coverage messaging. On the opposite, gaining appreciable floor, had been tradition and id narratives fuelled by anxiousness over exterior affect.

Initially of the election cycle in early March, information protection centred on value of residing pressures and tax cuts. The Labor authorities’s price range announcement and the Liberal Get together’s response cemented the agenda, with matters like grocery store worth gouging, gasoline excises, and nuclear vitality proposals putting a chord with voters. Early dialogue on social media confirmed a transparent concentrate on making life extra inexpensive for households. However within the background, frustration round Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs and considerations about Australia–U.S. relations started to floor. Peter Dutton’s early promise to chop 40,000 public service jobs and push for a return to workplace work additional fuelled comparisons between Dutton and Trump amongst Australian audiences.

Because the election cycle progressed, worldwide occasions and conflicts moved to the forefront. Trump’s presence in world headlines alongside Canada’s equally timed election, intensified comparisons between Australian and Canadian public attitudes towards American affect. Media narratives shifted from home cost-of-living considerations to broader conversations about defending the Australian lifestyle and defending nationwide pursuits significantly in training, reshaping the battleground on which voters made their choices.

On March 28, protection and dialogue spiked as Anthony Albanese formally introduced the election date. Earlier, on March 10, a surge in dialog centred on new polling that advised a possible hung parliament, sharpening media concentrate on Labor. Albanese’s look on At present, the place he responded to frustrations about delayed campaigning with, “We’re nearly serving to folks, as a result of that’s what folks count on,” strengthened his picture as a community-focused chief and contrasted with how previous prime ministers had been criticised throughout disasters. In the meantime, Peter Dutton’s social media consideration rose on April 12, as stories surfaced of his opponent Ali France main in Dickson whereas an area tent encampment was demolished by Moreton Bay Council. Dutton, campaigning in Perth in the course of the demolition, attracted criticism. A couple of days later, a compilation of clips linking Dutton to Donald Trump circulated extensively. These moments highlighted the distinct management kinds that formed voter perceptions all through the marketing campaign.

Though Labor drew probably the most consideration total, Dutton and the Liberals gained momentum throughout social media. The Liberal Get together’s early use of traits, AI instruments, and memes attracted dialog, however the involvement of influencers and podcasts proved polarising. Protection additionally highlighted a generational divide, with younger ladies leaning left and younger males leaning proper. Influencers performed a key position in shaping these dynamics, from Albanese’s Completely happy Hour podcast look on March 26, the place his “delulu with no solulu” problem dominated information cycles, to Dutton’s interview on Sam Fricker’s podcast aimed toward younger male voters. Because the marketing campaign progressed, information more and more centered on character assaults and gaffes on the expense of coverage debate. Points like housing, grocery store competitors, HECS reduction, and vitality payments remained core to occasion platforms, however many audiences had been drawn into yarns protecting persona clashes and tradition wars.

Probably the most shared information gadgets from the start of the marketing campaign to just lately underline this shift of consideration to cultural battle. Posts concerning the mobilisation of Muslim voters round Gaza, criticism of Liberal candidates campaigning in army uniforms, warnings about public service job cuts, and debates over the political leanings of younger male voters all reveal how particular cultural flashpoints and area of interest group appeals dominated dialogue. As an alternative of broad coverage debates, election discourse was fragmented into controversies that infected identity-driven tensions, polarised audiences, and heightened mistrust.

Whether or not leaders spoke about getting Australia again on monitor, constructing a greater Australia, and even making Australia nice once more, these slogans signalled clear messages to voters. As a rule, the general public expressed a want to distance Australia from america, significantly in defending healthcare and training programs that set Australia aside. Early within the marketing campaign, when a journalist advised Anthony Albanese’s use of “construct again higher” echoed Joe Biden’s slogan, the remark was rapidly dismissed. Although not formally endorsed, the slogan’s use by Jacinta Value and Clive Palmer rapidly eclipsed occasion strains, fuelling memes and comparisons to US Republicans throughout social media. This did little to assist the Liberals distance their official slogan, ‘Get Australia again on monitor,’ from US political parallels. As Trump’s affect turned a speaking level, glimpses of Trump-style messaging had been eagerly picked up by information retailers and social media alike, usually overshadowing Labor’s marketing campaign messaging and limiting its cut-through.

Because the marketing campaign unfolded, it turned tougher to separate coverage from persona or guarantees from the cultural narratives surrounding them. Media and social media consideration did greater than mirror public curiosity. They helped form it, steering the election dialog towards id, values, and questions on Australia’s place in a altering world. Whether or not that affect outweighed coverage in swaying voters continues to be up for debate, but it surely clearly modified how the marketing campaign was seen, shared, and remembered.

Uncover extra of our political information providers

”
(“post_title”)=>
string(68) “Did tradition wars lower by way of greater than coverage on the election path?”
(“post_excerpt”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_status”)=>
string(7) “publish”
(“comment_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“ping_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“post_password”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_name”)=>
string(67) “did-culture-wars-cut-through-more-than-policy-on-the-election-trail”
(“to_ping”)=>
string(0) “”
(“pinged”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_modified”)=>
string(19) “2025-05-01 04:22:11”
(“post_modified_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-05-01 04:22:11”
(“post_content_filtered”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_parent”)=>
int(0)
(“guid”)=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=39594”
(“menu_order”)=>
int(0)
(“post_type”)=>
string(4) “put up”
(“post_mime_type”)=>
string(0) “”
(“comment_count”)=>
string(1) “0”
(“filter”)=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#10884 (24) {
(“ID”)=>
int(39404)
(“post_author”)=>
string(2) “36”
(“post_date”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-23 23:54:03”
(“post_date_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-23 23:54:03”
(“post_content”)=>
string(8890) “

With social media platforms changing into central to political engagement, figures like Abbie Chatfield, Friendlyjordies, and The Juice Media are amplifying progressive causes and difficult conventional political narratives. However how important is their influence? Are they genuinely influencing the election dialog, or is their affect extra about their capacity to seize consideration and drive engagement? This evolving pattern raises essential questions concerning the position of influencers in fashionable elections and the way they’re reshaping the way in which political messages are communicated to youthful, digital-savvy voters.

Because the 2025 Australian federal election nears, influencer involvement has gained consideration, with social media main the cost whereas information protection initially lagged. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Chief Peter Dutton are tapping influencers to attach with youthful voters—Albanese engages with Abbie Chatfield’s viewers by way of values-driven storytelling, whereas Dutton targets younger males with Sam Fricker’s relatable podcasts. This displays a broader shift from conventional media to platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Journalists are more and more protecting these influencer-driven moments, usually specializing in the viral unfold and political fallout. As an illustration, a viral February 13 video from an Israeli influencer accusing two NSW nurses of hateful feedback dominated Australia’s information cycle, prompting swift political reactions. Protection typically focuses on political responses, not the influencers themselves. This pattern was additionally seen with Greens Chief Adam Bandt’s DJ occasion in Melbourne, the place media famous his try to have interaction youthful voters. The Australian Electoral Fee cleared Chatfield’s posts that includes Albanese and Bandt, highlighting the rising regulation of influencer political content material. This focus in the direction of viral moments over coverage discussions raises questions concerning the influence on undecided voters and the evolving position of journalists in political engagement.

Influencers like Abbie Chatfield, The Juice Media, and Friendlyjordies have gotten central to the election rhetoric forward of the 2025 Australian federal election. Chatfield, who confronted scrutiny from the AEC, used her platform to rally help for the Greens, positioning herself in opposition to what she described as a Liberal media technique to discredit influencers. Her posts, significantly defending her political involvement, have garnered sturdy help, with hashtags like #abbieisinnocent and #freeabbie dominating her remark sections. In distinction, some critics dismiss her political position, questioning her credibility. The Juice Media, identified for its sarcastic takes on authorities coverage, continues to problem political narratives with irreverent content material, resonating with youthful, disillusioned voters. Nevertheless, their strategy additionally faces backlash from those that see it as too cynical or divisive. Equally, Friendlyjordies critiques each main events, significantly Labor’s stance on progressive points, whereas encouraging followers to unite in opposition to company greed. His platform sparks heated debates, igniting each help and criticism. 

Total, these influencers have gotten polarising figures, amplifying political engagement whereas intensifying the ideological divide on social media, finally shaping the rising affect of social media figures within the election discourse.

Chatfield, a vocal supporter of progressive causes like Palestinian liberation and girls’s rights, has gained a robust following however faces criticism for oversimplifying political points and for her perceived naivety, particularly relating to preferential voting. Ferguson, who critiques colonialism and helps Palestinian liberation, is praised by supporters however criticised for missing depth in her activism, with some accusing her of ignoring intersectionality. Friendlyjordies, identified for satirical commentary, is admired for calling out political corruption, however his critics accuse him of bias in the direction of Labor and oversimplifying complicated points. The Juice Media, utilizing sarcasm to critique authorities insurance policies, resonates with disillusioned younger voters however alienates others who discover their strategy too cynical. These influencers contribute to a rising divide in Australian politics, mobilising progressive actions whereas deepening ideological rifts, as their content material each challenges conventional politics and fuels polarisation.

Key points like defence, the price of residing, and training are dominating political discourse and social media conversations. World occasions, together with Trump’s affect on worldwide relations and commerce, have sparked sturdy reactions, with Albanese dealing with backlash over Australia’s stance on Gaza and its defence ties with Israel. In the meantime, Dutton’s feedback on Ambassador Kevin Rudd and allegations of election interference have stirred tensions. On social media, debates over defence—highlighted by Indonesia’s denial of Russia’s army presence close to Darwin—and price of residing considerations are intensifying. Schooling stays a key level of distinction, with Albanese’s Free TAFE coverage gaining help whereas Dutton faces criticism for prioritising fossil gasoline subsidies. Influencers are driving a lot of this engagement, however their position in amplifying already polarised narratives raises questions on whether or not they’re actually reflecting voters’ considerations or deepening divides because the election approaches.

These conversations play out in opposition to a panorama through which social and information media have totally different – however overlapping – priorities. They’re driving debates on every little thing from training and nuclear vitality to Trump-style politics and renewable vitality. With the 2025 federal election on the horizon, tales sparked by creators — whether or not by way of critique, leaks, or commentary — have gotten a part of the political media combine. It’s a shift that’s unfolding in actual time, and one which’s reshaping how narratives break, unfold, and acquire momentum. However as these voices develop louder, one factor is evident: Are they really amplifying the considerations of on a regular basis Australians, or are they pushing additional divides in a panorama already ripe with fragmentation?

Uncover extra of our political information providers

”
(“post_title”)=>
string(73) “The rise of influencers within the 2025 Australian federal election panorama”
(“post_excerpt”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_status”)=>
string(7) “publish”
(“comment_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“ping_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“post_password”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_name”)=>
string(54) “the-rise-of-influencers-in-the-2025-election-landscape”
(“to_ping”)=>
string(0) “”
(“pinged”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_modified”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-24 00:08:49”
(“post_modified_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-24 00:08:49”
(“post_content_filtered”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_parent”)=>
int(0)
(“guid”)=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=39404”
(“menu_order”)=>
int(0)
(“post_type”)=>
string(4) “put up”
(“post_mime_type”)=>
string(0) “”
(“comment_count”)=>
string(1) “0”
(“filter”)=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#8602 (24) {
(“ID”)=>
int(39139)
(“post_author”)=>
string(2) “75”
(“post_date”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-16 03:17:43”
(“post_date_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-16 03:17:43”
(“post_content”)=>
string(8294) “

In Singapore, the rise of podcasting has shifted from leisure and way of life into a brand new area – public discourse and politics. Because the 2025 Common Election attracts close to, podcasters are making waves throughout on-line information and social media. To kick issues off, we used Narrative AI, the primary search engine for public opinion, to determine how giant the worldwide narrative on podcasts and their affect on audiences is within the final 6 months, utilizing information from X.

We subsequently narrowed the main target of this world pattern to Singapore and analysed on Pulsar TRAC greater than 7k mentions throughout platforms like YouTube, Fb, Reddit, TikTok, podcasts, On-line Information, blogs and boards to know the place the discourse is coming from, which channels are capturing the podcasters’ content material and the way audiences are responding to this content material. 

Mentions of podcasts in information and social media are rising

Social media is the place the bigger chunk of podcast dialog is happening, particularly these episodes that characteristic a political determine, journalist or those who embody healthcare-related discussions. The audiences that have interaction with these movies, majority being on YouTube, seek for political credibility that resonates with them. Younger Singaporeans watching these podcasts count on to see leaders who don’t simply uphold the picture of being a politician, but additionally somebody who’s grounded and reliable.

Youth and politicians’ lives dominate podcast narratives

The audiences that devour these podcasts probably the most are younger Singaporeans seeking to take part within the dialog as a lot as they will. These audiences are being extra proactive than ever.

With youthful voters consuming media in another way, these appearances are efforts by political candidates to attach with the general public. Lawrence Wong, Josephine Teo, Indranee Rajah, and Desmond Tan, have used podcasts to speak immediately with the general public – sidestepping conventional media filters.

Prime podcasters on election-related content material

Once we concentrate on who probably the most talked about podcasters round election content material are, the Straits Occasions’ podcasts, the Day by day Ketchup and Yah Lah BUT emerge on high. These podcasts have figured that probably the most discourse occurs round content material that’s both instructional or controversial round elections. The general public is actively responding to political content material shared by way of podcasts, significantly these by The Straits Occasions and unbiased reveals like Yah Lah BUT. 

How are podcasts doing on Tiktok?

Satire and irony are key methods to make politics palatable, particularly for youthful, digital-native audiences. The Day by day Ketchup and Yah Lah BUT are mixing severe matters just like the GE2025, occasion agendas, healthcare, and opposition voices with humour that make them virtually meme-worthy. Posts equivalent to “PAP actually mentioned: ‘Belief me, bro’” TikTok clips present that these are genuinely made for content material to go viral whereas retaining severe undertones too. 

What’s fascinating to notice is that The Widespread Of us, with content material in Malay and Indonesian, is tapping right into a cross-border Southeast Asian viewers and has a number of the highest engagement on its content material. Native slang, cultural jokes, and informal festive content material like Raya greetings and songkok jokes have generated 1000’s of views, at instances outperforming English-language political pods. This means a big, under-acknowledged urge for food for vernacular podcast content material that has a mix of humour and relatability. 

Podcasts are not simply background noise – they’re changing into one of the related methods Singaporeans have interaction with politics. With excessive engagement on platforms like TikTok and YouTube, a large unfold of matters from youth points to occasion politics, and rising presence in each mainstream and social media, podcasters are carving out a key position in shaping the GE 2025 dialog. 

Eager about studying extra? E mail us at data@isentia.com

”
(“post_title”)=>
string(64) “What’s making podcasts stand out forward of the Singapore GE2025?”
(“post_excerpt”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_status”)=>
string(7) “publish”
(“comment_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“ping_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“post_password”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_name”)=>
string(65) “what-is-making-podcasts-stand-out-ahead-of-the-singapore-election”
(“to_ping”)=>
string(0) “”
(“pinged”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_modified”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-16 04:30:10”
(“post_modified_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-16 04:30:10”
(“post_content_filtered”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_parent”)=>
int(0)
(“guid”)=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=39139”
(“menu_order”)=>
int(0)
(“post_type”)=>
string(4) “put up”
(“post_mime_type”)=>
string(0) “”
(“comment_count”)=>
string(1) “0”
(“filter”)=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}

object(WP_Post)#10882 (24) {
(“ID”)=>
int(39117)
(“post_author”)=>
string(2) “36”
(“post_date”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-15 23:08:54”
(“post_date_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-15 23:08:54”
(“post_content”)=>
string(10484) “

Because the federal election marketing campaign reaches its midpoint, patterns in media protection and public consideration are starting to shift. Early social engagement was pushed by cost-of-living pressures, vitality coverage, and political point-scoring, however has waned following the primary leaders debate, regardless of this discussion board offering leaders the chance to set the agenda and methods of the main events. So how has protection focus advanced for the reason that first debate and are audiences nonetheless participating with the marketing campaign or switching off?

Social media engagement forward of the federal election has been sharp and private. It centered much less on coverage and extra on id and illustration. From debates on matters equivalent to  immigration to housing stress and tradition, social media has pushed a values-first narrative. However whereas early consideration  was sturdy, each media protection and social engagement have began to wane within the weeks for the reason that marketing campaign launched. The primary leaders debate briefly reignited consideration—belief, id, and media—however protection patterns recommend a shift away from every day blow-by-blow reporting in the direction of broader social and cultural tensions.

Because the federal election marketing campaign nears its midway mark, final week’s media highlights present a contest nonetheless struggling to chop by way of. Key moments included the primary chief’s debate, the Treasurers Debate, the vitality showdown on the Nationwide Press Membership, and Senator Jacinta Value’s Perth look with Peter Dutton, which drew consideration for its MAGA-style rhetoric.  The primary leaders debate was billed as an opportunity to reset the race—however for a lot of viewers, it strengthened present divides. Media consideration across the debate momentarily lifted visibility for all main events—however the spike was short-lived. The one occasion that has seen continued will increase in social media engagement is the Liberal Get together. The Liberal Get together’s sustained rise in social media engagement could also be linked to its digital-first technique, together with an AI-generated marketing campaign advert spruiking a gasoline excise lower and a meme-style diss monitor focusing on Anthony Albanese—techniques designed to seize on-line consideration and drive shareability.

The Liberals additionally pitched a $1200 tax lower, Labor attacked their WFH backflip, and the Greens pushed housing and tax reform. In the meantime, Dutton warned of a Labor-Greens-Teal alliance. Protection suggests public engagement is pushed extra by polarising moments and political theatre than detailed coverage.

When the election marketing campaign formally kicked off, cost-of-living pressures dominated the information agenda. Contemporary off the again of the federal price range, it’s no shock that inexpensive healthcare, decrease gasoline and vitality costs, and tax cuts had been the important thing messages occasion leaders wished to land with voters. However protection rapidly pivoted. Up to now week, overseas diplomacy—significantly how every chief would handle Donald Trump—has surged in prominence. Whereas Trump’s position in tariff threats has made headlines, his affect on the broader election narrative goes past commerce. Media reporting has more and more centred on Albanese and Dutton’s capability to navigate a possible Trump presidency, with ideological alignment, nationwide safety, and financial fallout all in play. The primary leaders’ debate was anticipated to refocus the marketing campaign on home points. Nevertheless, it briefly touched on worldwide considerations, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese addressing the potential financial influence of Trump’s proposed tariffs. Albanese described these tariffs as an “act of financial self-harm” that will dampen world progress, highlighting the intertwining of overseas coverage with home financial considerations. This means that sustained consideration is extra probably when home points are reframed by way of the lens of overseas diplomacy, and nationwide id.

Within the social media panorama, Trump was a flashpoint in election-related dialog. His affect—actual or perceived—was rapidly linked to the Liberal Get together, with MAGA-style rhetoric and Trumpian coverage cues gaining traction on-line. These narratives are likely to escalate on platforms the place ideological alignment and cultural grievance amplify engagement. Nevertheless it wasn’t all imported tradition wars—the federal price range, and the Liberal Get together’s gasoline excise rebuttal, additionally drove important social chatter. In latest weeks, comparisons between main occasion messaging and Trump-era coverage—from worldwide pupil caps and nuclear vitality to debates about college curricula—have continued to dominate dialogue.

The primary leaders’ debate briefly touched on overseas coverage, with Albanese warning Trump’s tariffs may harm world progress, whereas Dutton framed it as a take a look at of sturdy management. Domestically, Dutton’s renewed push for nuclear energy reignited social media debate—drawing comparisons to Trump-era insurance policies and fuelling dialogue about Australia’s vitality future. On the similar time on social media, guarantees like HECS cuts, free TAFE, and extra funding for public faculties sparked real engagement, particularly amongst youthful voters and training employees, displaying that sensible, future-focused insurance policies can nonetheless lower by way of. In comparison with the beginning of the marketing campaign, the place cost-of-living dominated as a top-line concern, the dialog has expanded: audiences are actually weighing each hip-pocket points and the nationwide values shaping Australia’s future.

Whereas the controversy itself tended to be overshadowed by frustrations about entry and media management, a number of political undercurrents nonetheless surfaced. Anthony Albanese drew some optimistic mentions, however reactions had been removed from policy-focused. The Liberal Get together’s early declare of victory turned some extent of humour, with a number of customers likening it to Trump-style misinformation techniques. Disillusionment with the main events ran deep, with repeated calls to “break the donor-fuelled duopoly” and shift help towards independents or smaller events. Nonetheless, these reactions appear extra like a symptom of broader voter cynicism than an indication of energised political engagement, reflecting broader themes across the declining belief.

The leaders’ debate didn’t reset the race—it refracted it, spotlighting how media protection is now formed much less by coverage element and extra by polarising symbols and cultural cues. As election day nears, the competition for consideration is revealing simply as a lot about media technique and voter fatigue as it’s about occasion platforms.

Uncover extra of our political information providers

”
(“post_title”)=>
string(78) “Did the leaders debate reignite voter curiosity or simply stoke the tradition wars?”
(“post_excerpt”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_status”)=>
string(7) “publish”
(“comment_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“ping_status”)=>
string(4) “open”
(“post_password”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_name”)=>
string(77) “did-the-leaders-debate-reignite-voter-interest-or-just-stoke-the-culture-wars”
(“to_ping”)=>
string(0) “”
(“pinged”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_modified”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-15 23:49:24”
(“post_modified_gmt”)=>
string(19) “2025-04-15 23:49:24”
(“post_content_filtered”)=>
string(0) “”
(“post_parent”)=>
int(0)
(“guid”)=>
string(32) “https://www.isentia.com/?p=39117”
(“menu_order”)=>
int(0)
(“post_type”)=>
string(4) “put up”
(“post_mime_type”)=>
string(0) “”
(“comment_count”)=>
string(1) “0”
(“filter”)=>
string(3) “uncooked”
}